TimberwolfCY
Newbie
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 27
Independent Taiwan!
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: February 17, 2009, 06:15:49 PM » |
|
This is an ideal applied (at least, theoretically) in classical fencing. The idea is to "hit without being hit." Everything is supposed to end with only one touch, on the attacker or defender, but not both. I'm not quite sure how strictly this is followed/enforced in classical fencing, as I am an Olympic/sport fencer, but I think the idea deserves strong consideration. If one is truly thinking about how to avoid being killed or injured, it fosters a new kind of fencing. In epee fencing, up until only a few decades ago, all epee in tournaments was done to only one touch. If both got touches, both lost. There are reports of some one-touch epee bouts lasting well over an hour, because neither wanted to make any "fatal" mistake. Nowadays, epee has maximum score like foil and saber do, first to 15 touches win, and if there is a simultaneous touch (both fencers hit each other at almost the exact same time) than BOTH get the point. However, again, even in sport fencing, double-touches are avoided as much as possible, for the simple fact that if both get a touch and you're in the lead, you have failed to continue to open the gap, you have merely increased score.
There is also a lengthy discussion in Bushido Shoshinsu (sp? couldn't find my copy at the moment) about keeping death in mind at all times, in all places. This isn't to say (as the author points out) that you should think that, since you could die at any moment, you should just give up in life; rather, quite the opposite: that you should always strive as hard as possible in everything you do, because you never know when the final moment will come. Therefore, by keeping the concept of death in mind at all times, you will always be motivated to do your best.
Just my 2 cents.
|